7 ms·
I agree with your general take but I'm surprised by your last line. > I think Mr. Thiel will regret his place in history. But it's very hard to blame him or Pa
by adjkant 6y ago
I agree with your general take but I'm surprised by your last line.
> I think Mr. Thiel will regret his place in history. But it's very hard to blame him or Palantir. It's like blaming the sharpness of a knife when someone stabs you.
If Thiel actually wanted to help the problem, there are surely much better ways than making Palantir. I think the "someone else will" logic is a thinly veiled excuse to justify what he wants to do, for other reasons. I think he 100% made the world worse with what was done here, and deserves according blame for that.
To replace your analogy, I would say he saw a stabbing about to happen and instead of attempting to stop it, he decided to stab the person with a slightly blunter knife. The analogy breaks here, but this could have been thought on for years, and he couldn't think up any other solution to it, or spend his time somewhere more worthwhile instead? Even a failed attempt to stop the stabbing would have at least been understandable.
- badrabbit 6y agoI wasn't saying he was right but that ultimate cause and blame is not pointed at him. Much like the role IBM and BMW played when helping the Nazis. (Not that I think the US IC is anywhere near as bad).
- nelaboras 6y agofundamental difference between a business being co-opted by an autocratic state (do x or we take you over/arrest your families/...) and a business choosing to create a certain product that they could simply not have created. A better analogy might be a weapons company that chooses to make cluster grenades or chemical weapons knowing that they are not ethical even as far as weapons (machine learning) go, but it pays well..
- badrabbit 6y agoIBM is american,they volunteered to help Germany before the US cared about WW2