4 ms·
It's not XUL anymore, actually, as far as I know. That's why it ripped out support for XUL addons.
by kick 6y ago
It's not XUL anymore, actually, as far as I know. That's why it ripped out support for XUL addons.
- monocasa 6y agoFirefox has been ripping out xul, but Thunderbird still appears to support it.
- kick 6y agoOnly if you're using a ridiculously outdated copy: changed Add-on support: Add-ons are only supported if add-on authors have adapted them changed Dictionary support: Only WebExtension dictionaries are supported now. Both addons.mozilla.org and addons.thunderbird.net now provide WebExtension dictionaries. changed Theme support: Only WebExtension themes are supported now. Both addons.mozilla.org and addons.thunderbird.net now provide WebExtension themes. https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/68.0/releasenotes/ https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/68.0/releaseno...
- monocasa 6y agoLiterally here's a doc explaining how XUL has changed as of Thunderbird 68, the most recent version, released about a month and a half ago. Yes, some elements have been removed, but others have been modified and still exist. https://developer.thunderbird.net/add-ons/updating/tb68/changes https://developer.thunderbird.net/add-ons/updating/tb68/chan... And that's in the add-on documentation, not even just internal development docs. Also, describing information changed in the most recent stable release, a month and a half ago, hardly qualifies any older as "ridiculously outdated ".