4 ms·
And who decides what the issues are that get voted on? This is an important flaw IMO against multi issue voting with this system. If the people making the list
by erentz 6y ago
And who decides what the issues are that get voted on? This is an important flaw IMO against multi issue voting with this system.
If the people making the list of issues are biased they can make one big issue for all the stuff they care about, and a thousand little issues for the stuff other people care about.
Every issue needs equal footing to overcome this, meaning each issue needs to be its own independent election, effectively making QV useless.
- tgv 6y agoI too think it's totally possible to rig such elections. E.g., if there's something group A wants, but you don't, you add something group A is totally against, so all their votes will go to the latter issue, and the status quo is kept as far as group A is concerned. Meanwhile, their votes are lost for other issues.