There's a license for that: http://matt.might.net/articles/crapl/ http://matt.might.net/articles/crapl/ I know free software debaters and open source license p

There's a license for that: http://matt.might.net/articles/crapl/ http://matt.might.net/articles/crapl/ I know free software debaters and open source license philosophers love to hate on this one, but the fundamental core concept of "more importantly, it should absolve authors of shame, embarrassment and ridicule for ugly code" in the context of them choosing to release code or not is a great idea I reckon. (But I agree wholeheartedly with the thrust of your argument, and am of the opinion that if you spent more time on the logo design or website marketing copy for your library than you did writing the code, then "You're doin' it wrong...")