3 ms·
I really like the idea of this assuming it’s some kind of vote credit rather than money, and the vote credits are distributed equally per person. However, it do
by noodlesUK 6y ago
I really like the idea of this assuming it’s some kind of vote credit rather than money, and the vote credits are distributed equally per person. However, it doesn’t take into account that the number of things to vote on might not be fixed (or even finite). As more things to vote on are added, do people get more votes? How are they distributed? This would create a whole new variable to gerrymander.