3 ms·

I think the article can serve as a good opinion and an introduction to the subject. Certain ideas seem questionable enough - maybe the matter is inherently more

by avmich 6y ago

I think the article can serve as a good opinion and an introduction to the subject. Certain ideas seem questionable enough - maybe the matter is inherently more complex than something which can be put in an article. Does, for example, author argue that something which human can do the machine cannot?

di4na 6y ago
Not really but he would be right if he did. He argues that deep down the goal of the machine is to take decisions in humans contexts. Which by definition only can make sense for a human. Ofc we can argue about a fictional theoretical human like machine to the point it is undifferentiated from a human... but then we created a human. Not a machine anymore.
- avmich 6y ago
  > Not a machine anymore. It's like failing to see the difference between human and machine. One can argue then there is no difference right now. So? It's a time-honored discussion if machine can do all a human can. On the other hand, religion also has an associated long-living discussion. If we decide according to our beliefs, we should invent another mechanism - something other than reasoning, because it's not used here - to get to agreement.