5 ms·
I'm confused what the implication of the title is supposed to be. Should he have given each restaurant $50 million? It really makes no sense to think of it as a
by nv-vn 6y ago
I'm confused what the implication of the title is supposed to be. Should he have given each restaurant $50 million? It really makes no sense to think of it as a percentage of his wealth, because it clearly brings $800k in benefits to the people he gave it to. And they even mention that he's pledged to donate 99% of his wealth... so why does it matter what amount of that goes to this specific cause? Doesn't the fact that he's giving away 99% of his wealth imply he's plenty generous?