3 ms·
yep so not 100% the same, but my point with linking to it is tunables / levers / control is useful. In other scenarios maybe you could get by without having to
by nhoughto 6y ago
yep so not 100% the same, but my point with linking to it is tunables / levers / control is useful. In other scenarios maybe you could get by without having to do a rewrite in Rust, maybe you could keep it in golang and tune the GC a bit.
Whilst I like the memory ballast as a clever solution, it does smell like a workaround to a solvable problem if a parameter existed to tune it directly.
- tptacek 6y agoIt's totally a workaround and I'm jumping on that last comment when I shouldn't be; it's just a reaction to the hyperbolic "you might have to rewrite" conclusion, because you won't have to rewrite, but indeed you might be annoyed by the lack of tunables.