Two reactions to this: 1) I love first looks at Twitter, since it's got such an emergent, gee-why-didn't-I-think-of-that feel to it, but we already have some i

Two reactions to this: 1) I love first looks at Twitter, since it's got such an emergent, gee-why-didn't-I-think-of-that feel to it, but we already have some idea of what the creation of Twitter was like (http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/04/jack-dorsey-201104 http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/04/jack-dor...) (Do remember that it took them 9 months to hit 100k accounts http://www.quora.com/Twitter-Growth-Traction/How-long-did-it-take-Twitter-to-reach-100k-users?q=twitter+traction http://www.quora.com/Twitter-Growth-Traction/How-long-did-it..., and it was about a year before the SXSW that made them famous). 2) I find the quality of writing in this article really amusing. Siegler's just repeating everything that Dorsey says. Posting screenies of Dorsey's tweets and removing all text would say the exact same thing.