John Carmack who cleaned up the codes take. > it turned out that it fared a lot better going through the gauntlet of code analysis tools I hit it with than a l

John Carmack who cleaned up the codes take. > it turned out that it fared a lot better going through the gauntlet of code analysis tools I hit it with than a lot of more modern code. There is something to be said for straightforward C code. Bugs were found and fixed, but generally in paths that weren't enabled or hit. https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1254872370260652033 https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1254872370260652033 Also his opinion on the deniers efforts. > It is disappointing, but not really unexpected, to see this take on the epidemic simulation code release: https://lockdownsceptics.org/code-review-of-fergusons-model/ https://lockdownsceptics.org/code-review-of-fergusons-model/ If we accept it at face value, we have a retired software engineer making the case that non-determinism in a simulation shows incompetence. https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1258192134752145412 https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1258192134752145412