> To model something you need to simplify it. What's he suggesting instead? But is set theory "simple"? The author mentions several ways in which it is the opp

> To model something you need to simplify it. What's he suggesting instead? But is set theory "simple"? The author mentions several ways in which it is the opposite of simple. Also - if you need to model _something_, that doesn't mean you should try to model _everything_ with the same kind of model.