6 ms·
That's pretty clunky. - there's probably a pretty low limit for size of Google queries, you'll likely hit it quickly - you won't be able to search for e.g a s
by abraae 6y ago
That's pretty clunky.
- there's probably a pretty low limit for size of Google queries, you'll likely hit it quickly
- you won't be able to search for e.g a story about YouTube censoring some content
- peel40 6y agoI don't know about the current query size limit but I think it's pretty likely to get hit quickly as you correctly pointed out. But, it's useful to use the wildcard "-site" ex: "-site:bigwebsite.com" for excluding just the site, and not the very word being mentioned. ex: facebook censorship -site:facebook.com https://www.google.com/search?q=facebook+censorship+-site%3Afacebook.com&oq=facebook+censorship+-site%3Afacebook.com&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l2&client=ubuntu&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=facebook+censorship+-site%3A...
- Mandatum 6y agoFiltered out regional sites that Google wouldn't cater my search for (eg Taobao, Baidu, etc).. Only possible with 31 negative sites. -site:google.com -site:youtube.com -site:facebook.com -site:jd.com -site:yahoo.com -site:wikipedia.org -site:amazon.com -site:netflix.com -site:reddit.com -site:live.com -site:zoom.us -site:okezone.com -site:alipay.com -site:instagram.com -site:twitch.tv -site:csdn.net -site:blogspot.com -site:microsoft.com -site:bing.com -site:github.com -site:tribunnews.com -site:myshopify.com -site:office.com -site:panda.tv -site:stackoverflow.com -site:ebay.com -site:bongacams.com -site:livejasmin.com -site:babytree.com -site:naver.com -site:apple.com <search query>