4 ms·
Public health is controlled by the state though. FDA shouldn’t have jurisdiction in preventing a state from taking actions to control an outbreak.
by adrr 6y ago
Public health is controlled by the state though. FDA shouldn’t have jurisdiction in preventing a state from taking actions to control an outbreak.
- loeg 6y agoThe FDA doesn't object to the surveillance study, just the part where SCAN actually give individual test results to study participants ("diagnosis"). Nevermind that the informed consent form has explicitly told study participants they might get their results ("diagnosis") since early March, after the last time the FDA "helped": https://pastebin.com/wj6fMnrw https://pastebin.com/wj6fMnrw
- adrr 6y agoDoesn’t matter, testing the populace for public health matter like trying to control an outbreak is the right of the state. Telling people results is needed so people can self quarantine. State has the ultimate authority. Washington should tell the Feds to go pound sand on anything covid related including what tests to use. There are multiple Supreme Court rulings on this matter.
- loeg 6y ago> testing the populace for public health matter like trying to control an outbreak is the right of the state. Telling people results is needed so people can self quarantine. I agree with this part. As to the rest, I am not a lawyer.