> They’re in the bar graph, expressed as rates per 100k. AFAICT that's per 100k total population, not per 100k infected (which amounts to 0.2% total FR citywid

> They’re in the bar graph, expressed as rates per 100k. AFAICT that's per 100k total population, not per 100k infected (which amounts to 0.2% total FR citywide, not even IFR). Or am I missing the graph you mean? > The values cited by the OP (>>1.5%) are far too high, and based on severity-biased samples were gathered early in the pandemic. I am OP. They're based on an antibody study currently ongoing in my country so... no, they're not far too high nor severity-biased. (I'm trying to find links in English, but no luck so far).