3 ms·
That is, what he was saying is usually interpreted as 'execution is ALL that counts'. Again, as the article clearly states, "Having a great idea is not enough.
by georgieporgie 16y ago
That is, what he was saying is usually interpreted as 'execution is ALL that counts'.
Again, as the article clearly states, "Having a great idea is not enough. It is the manner in which ideas are executed that counts." The idea is clearly mentioned here as part of the formula.
I'm sorry, but you're just making bizarre leaps from what the article said.
- NY_USA_Hacker 16y agoYou have a serious emotional block here. I addressed exactly this pair of sentences. Read what I actually wrote. Or yet again, push down your emotional whatever and just pay a little attention: The second sentence, given how the English language works, is essentially saying that execution is ALL that "counts" so that necessarily the idea doesn't count. So the second sentence contradicts the first. He's writing garbage, and you are reading into it what you want.
- georgieporgie 16y agoI think you might be a little bit insane.