If 30% of dine-in prices go to rent / seating / storefront marketing, why shouldn’t 30% of the takeout price (which is the same) go to subsidize the delivery in

If 30% of dine-in prices go to rent / seating / storefront marketing, why shouldn’t 30% of the takeout price (which is the same) go to subsidize the delivery infrastructure? Why are restaurant owners ok with paying so much for rent on a useless (during COVID) storefront in a high traffic area, but when Uber Eats gives them more marketing and orders than the storefront does, Uber Eats is the bad guy. Be mad at the landlord or COVID, not Uber.