4 ms·
Because no-ones going to pay for them to do that. And most of the staff would quit. They have families, children, partners. You think they'll give up 12 weeks
by mattmanser 6y ago
Because no-ones going to pay for them to do that. And most of the staff would quit.
They have families, children, partners. You think they'll give up 12 weeks of their lives locked in with their wards?
You really sound like a dangerous idiot, glad you're not in power.
- exdsq 6y agoThat’s not as crazy an idea as you make it sound. Furlough those who can’t and hire those who were let go and can. The government could help support costs.
- arcticbull 6y ago> Because no-ones going to pay for them to do that. And most of the staff would quit. Seriously? Cost is now the factor? I think we can find it in our 3 trillion dollar stimulus budget. > They have families, children, partners. You think they'll give up 12 weeks of their lives locked in with their wards? Is this a pandemic or is this stay and home tea party time? > You really sound like a dangerous idiot, glad you're not in power. Thanks man, regardless of whether you agree with me or not, I'd point you at the HN post guidelines.