4 ms·
I once used something called Floobits[1] that was capable of this. In practice collaborative editing wasn't that much more useful vs screen sharing and the addi
by jpgvm 6y ago
I once used something called Floobits[1] that was capable of this. In practice collaborative editing wasn't that much more useful vs screen sharing and the additional constraints of managing Floobits workspaces didn't make it worth it for us.
[1] https://floobits.com/ https://floobits.com/
- em-bee 6y agoi find collaborative editing most useful for online docs, like wiki pages, etc. not having to worry about locking makes a big difference when editing is fast paced
- elviejo 6y agoWhat makes floobits awesome is that it could will allow someone using Vim and someone using Emacs to do pair programming. And if you can make Emacs and vim users happy then you can have world peace. The only problem we had with it, was that it was only 99% reliable... And that 1% error (in the connections dropping and such) was annoying. But I still consider floobits a project with great potential.
- bjonnh 6y agoWhat happens when network drops? Do you have a chance to merge conflicts? Or one version wins?
- dunham 6y agoI did pair programming on XEmacs in the 90's by opening a new frame on a second X server. It worked surprisingly well as long as both people stayed out of the minibuffer.
- teddyh 6y agoA.k.a. M-x make-frame-on-display. It’s nice, but it does not show the cursor of the other person, which makes it hard.
- bjonnh 6y agoThat looks nice, however for those interested, only the plugins are opensource and usage is not free. The good thing is that it shows what is possible.
- sulam 6y agoNot every tool we use has to be free.