4 ms·
Eh, the purpose would be to demonstrate that a camera took the shot. The fact that it id’s which one specifically isn’t particularly material but might be a li
by jcims 7y ago
Eh, the purpose would be to demonstrate that a camera took the shot. The fact that it id’s which one specifically isn’t particularly material but might be a little useful in some circumstances.
You wouldn’t need to publish the unprocessed photo, just keep it in escrow.
- londons_explore 7y agoNothing stops you editing the photo, printing it out, and taking a photo of the printout. The new photo would still get signed, and look original. And if you did this in the right conditions, it wouldn't be possible to tell it was a photo of a print.
- quonn 7y agoSince all the metadata (exposure time, shutter speed and so on) in the photo is signed as well, it would be possible to tell.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]