3 ms·
Sourcehut [is] barely functional in a lot of ways. Since when? It has the best CI, has the best interface, has both Hg and git support, and does pretty much ev
by kick 6y ago
Sourcehut [is] barely functional in a lot of ways.
Since when? It has the best CI, has the best interface, has both Hg and git support, and does pretty much everything a forge is supposed to do. It also does discovery better than any other platform.
I disagree with the rest of your comment, but the rest is wrong enough and obviously in bad faith enough that a response would be unnecessary.
- hombre_fatal 6y agoYeah, just reads like someone disgruntled at how SourceHut spent the $5 they gave them. Reminds me of the kind of comments I unlocked when I took donations for my forum and someone who gave me $10 once, a year ago, would write paragraphs about how I'm misallocating their money.
- majewsky 6y ago> It also does discovery better than any other platform. So I went to https://git.sr.ht/ https://git.sr.ht/ which shows me nothing but buttons for login and register. Same for https://sr.ht/ https://sr.ht/. I'm really confused if I'm holding something wrong, but this doesn't look like discoverability at all. Is it better if I create an account?
- kick 6y agoYes, the site makes much more sense if you create an account (without an account you can still contribute to projects, though!), but you don't have to if you just want to browse projects: https://sr.ht/projects https://sr.ht/projects This is the easiest possible interface for discovery of projects, which is (in my opinion) something that GitLab and GitHub are pretty dreadful at. I'd go as far as to say there hasn't been a forge good at it since two SourceForge redesigns ago.
- kwk1 6y agosourcehut.org is the proper landing page.
- majewsky 6y agoOkay, but that one does not provide discovery either. It's just a regular product landing page just like github.com or gitlab.com