3 ms·
These are not side effects of the disease. These are side effects of the "safety" measures such as "shelter in place" and lockdowns. I feel that you are side
by glofish 6y ago
These are not side effects of the disease.
These are side effects of the "safety" measures such as "shelter in place" and lockdowns.
I feel that you are side tracking the discussion. The original topic here is that a disease that causes 0.024% IFR should not be addressed with measures that cause higher deaths in a different way.
- tylerjwilk00 6y agoI would up vote you more if I could. There is a weird group think happening on HN where you can't even question the quarantine measures. It's knee jerk virtue signalling and not data driven.
- DanBC 6y ago> The original topic here is that a disease that causes 0.024% IFR You misread the report because it puts the ifr at 0.63% (and that's going to be higher because they omit some deaths).
- glofish 6y agoThe 0.024% was for the age group under 50, that includes perhaps two thirds of the population.