4 ms·
all hospital visits are way down. No general health checkups, no doctor visits are allowed No screening for cancer, no screening for TB No "elective" surgeri
by glofish 6y ago
all hospital visits are way down.
No general health checkups, no doctor visits are allowed
No screening for cancer, no screening for TB
No "elective" surgeries may be performed (note how everything other what would kill you tomorrow is called "elective")
Depression,
Food security,
Reduced exercise, reduced stimuli
Tens of millions of kids not vaccinated, shall I continue?
- gerdesj 6y agoThose are not measures they are some of the awful, additional side effects we see due to COVID-19. I'm sure we all try to reduce them as best we can. Here, the NHS repeatedly asks people with problems that would normally require a visit to A&E (ER) to do so. They really do have capacity to deal with cancer, heart attacks, stroke, etc in a safe way. There are entire wards and buildings that are segregated and "clean" of COVID-19 for this purpose. Elective is a funny old word and is a bit more nuanced than you imply. Some elective surgeries here are still going ahead. The list you provide is a starter for 10 of things that are and will go wrong for a long, long time but it is what seems to happen when a massive world wide pandemic strikes. This is a world war where everyone is near enough on the same side.
- glofish 6y agoThese are not side effects of the disease. These are side effects of the "safety" measures such as "shelter in place" and lockdowns. I feel that you are side tracking the discussion. The original topic here is that a disease that causes 0.024% IFR should not be addressed with measures that cause higher deaths in a different way.
- tylerjwilk00 6y agoI would up vote you more if I could. There is a weird group think happening on HN where you can't even question the quarantine measures. It's knee jerk virtue signalling and not data driven.
- DanBC 6y ago> The original topic here is that a disease that causes 0.024% IFR You misread the report because it puts the ifr at 0.63% (and that's going to be higher because they omit some deaths).
- glofish 6y agoThe 0.024% was for the age group under 50, that includes perhaps two thirds of the population.
- kmlx 6y agono dentist btw. which reduces life expectancy.