4 ms·
The problem is the way the author instantly jumps from "98% pure functional programming doesn't work" to "you should use OOP." In order to bridge the gap, you
by implicit 6y ago
The problem is the way the author instantly jumps from "98% pure functional programming doesn't work" to "you should use OOP."
In order to bridge the gap, you have to make some pretty terrible assumptions:
If your code is not OO, it must be FP.
If your code is FP, it must be pure. Therefore,
If your code cannot be pure, it must be OO.