I think he does have a point. Thorough the social measures you take and depending what age groups you expose the most, you can (should) be able to skew the numb

I think he does have a point. Thorough the social measures you take and depending what age groups you expose the most, you can (should) be able to skew the numbers in having more infections in a age group than he other. If you skew the numbers towards the younger population, the end result is _better_ than the normal, presumably uniform, distribution. EDIT: I misunderstood GP's point. I'll still leave my reply as-is since i still think the general idea I was trying to convey is sound.