4 ms·
Ideally we could work on both. Remdisivir is apparently nightmareish to produce - it's unlikely that that Gilead can fully capture all the value on the market w
by icegreentea2 6y ago
Ideally we could work on both. Remdisivir is apparently nightmareish to produce - it's unlikely that that Gilead can fully capture all the value on the market with it alone, especially if another another therapeutic becomes available.
That said, it makes plenty of sense why you would begin with your drug that has already passed clinical trials. I'm a bit disappointed that the article didn't emphasis this point. I'm certain the authors know about it, and even if they aren't out writing a hachet job, it can make this piece seem like one.
- refurb 6y agoIn a world of limited resources, you have to make a call on which leads move forward in development. You can't move every program forward. And yes, remdesivir is a beast to make, but I don't think supply is an issue at all. They just packaged up and distributed 150 kg of it.
- ggm 6y agoAre we in a world of limited resources in this specific sense? We're in a world of 3 trillion dollar re-ignite the economy. Whats the resource limitation here?
- Slartie 6y agoMoney does not magically create the personnel qualified in scaling up drug production, nor does it magically make the necessary, specialized machinery appear. Furthermore, as described in the article, the manufacturing appears to rely a lot on various businesses which each perform one specific step with a compound and hand over the result to the next, and Gilead's core work seems to be to find these businesses, provide missing know-how, and coordinate all of their work such that the timelines and amounts produced line up. Just dumping money into an economy also does not magically make such specialized businesses appear all of a sudden; self-organizing systems like modern capitalistic economies require time to adjust to big changes in demand or supply of certain goods or services.
- ggm 6y agoI dislike Trump on principle and from the other side of the fence. I am a natural born 'big government' person. From my side of the fence, the one thing Trump said which made sense was: "there are 15 good candidate vaccines: we are pursuing all of them" That is exactly how the manhattan project ran: Thermal Diffusion, Gaseous Diffusion, Centrifuge and Calutron were all followed up, and it wound up that Thermal fed Calutron to increase yield but gaseous diffusion and centrifuges are what we use now. The point here is that they didn't penny-pinch "which one is better" they did them ALL