2 ms·
Then you misunderstood my comment because what I said was that because of its market share and age, it isn't the one to beat in terms of design, because we have
by pron 6y ago
Then you misunderstood my comment because what I said was that because of its market share and age, it isn't the one to beat in terms of design, because we have no sensible way to judge how good its design is, even in comparison to other languages. The sample size is just too small, and the experiment too young.
- littlestymaar 6y agoYes, that's what you said, and to make your point, you compared Rust to two super new languages that are still mostly developed by a single person and not being used anyware. Then you rectified yourself, and more accurately compared Rust with Haskell and other languages. At this point you already gave up on your initial argument, because no-one would consider Haskell too small to be a proper benchmark of a new functional programming language. Of course, as this is an internet argument, you're not going to recognize it. Now, since we are now circling back to the initial claims, I don't think this conversation is worth pursuing. Have a nice (and safe) day.
- pron 6y agoI think most people would think Haskell is too small and that we have enough experience with it to judge the merits of its design.