3 ms·

I don't get it, yes false positive removals are an issue worth discussing, but does it really warrant a whole WSJ front page article? Could WSJ make it any more

I don't get it, yes false positive removals are an issue worth discussing, but does it really warrant a whole WSJ front page article? Could WSJ make it any more obvious that they have a vendetta against tech companies and are just grasping at whatever hit piece they can get their hands on?

w-j-w 6y ago
Tech companies need to be held accountable for their actions by someone. That's always been journalism's job. As long as they don't print lies, I don't see the issue.
- DuskStar 6y ago
  As long as they don't print lies and don't play favorites, ideally.
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- izacus 6y ago
  Unfortunately I've seen WSJ (and several other tech media) print outright fabrications and omit whole pieces of stories to drive some agendas. It's hard to keep trusting them now.