4 ms·
My first thought was "Right lets keep this pretentious utter prat far away from coding or management of coding." The "ethical arguements" are frankly complete
by Nasrudith 6y ago
My first thought was "Right lets keep this pretentious utter prat far away from coding or management of coding."
The "ethical arguements" are frankly complete twaddle and long discredited luddite fallacies. Do you think your laundry should be performed by servants in pointless labor that could easily be subsitited with a washing machine using less water, time, and fossil fuels than transporting the workers? Even if you could afford it would be gratituous waste in the name of a dumb goal of shrinking the labor pool.
Involving more people doesn't in itself make a process any more or less ethical than stoning a person to death by a village is more ethical than a single executioner. It is the end goals and the means taken towards them that matter along with the efficiency.
The technical complexities are what make it fun akin to a puzzle. That is just a human thing about overcoming achieveable obstacles. Lifting a trivial weight isn't fun nor is straining to lift something beyond your capabilities completely but between the two? Yeah that activity is enjoyable. In all sorts of domains.