4 ms·
Grateful for the explanation, but the author's bias is questionable at best. He suggests, "If you want to stay informed, please forget the usual media outlets
by miles 16y ago
Grateful for the explanation, but the author's bias is questionable at best. He suggests,
"If you want to stay informed, please forget the usual media outlets and consult the following websites"
and goes on to list 3 nuclear lobbying websites.
So, ignore the independent media and get all of your information from pro-nuclear lobbies?
More: https://morgsatlarge.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/why-i-am-not-worried-about-japans-nuclear-reactors/#comment-93 https://morgsatlarge.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/why-i-am-not-w...
- samlevine 16y ago>So, ignore the independent media and get all of your information from pro-nuclear lobbies? The msm usually doesn't have any idea what they're talking about when they report on computer related issues, why do you expect them to be any better when it comes to nuclear power?
- ugh 16y agoYou wouldn't trust Greenpeace, you shouldn't trust the nuclear lobby. There are other independent sources available.
- kgarten 16y agoHe is not talking about msm but independent media. Mentioning Lobby groups as good information source discredits in my opinion the complete write-up. Also does the mentioning of "phd. scientist" ... So according to your analogy: Don't listen to independent tech news, just listen to what Gruber tells you about Apple ;)
- DennisP 16y agoBraveNewClimate is definitely an advocacy site, but I think it's unfair to call the guy a lobbyist. Your own link says he's a climate scientist, and doesn't make any claims that he has financial ties to the nuclear industry. The more I read about climate change and nuclear energy, the more pro-nuke I am. If I start writing up what I've learned on my blog, would you call me a lobbyist too?