3 ms·

So what was the actual change they were required to make?

• sp332 6y ago
  They made the two changes they said they would make in the previous blog post. https://twitter.com/pushbullet/status/1260692846111318028 https://twitter.com/pushbullet/status/1260692846111318028 So one or both of those.
• wffurr 6y ago
  According to Dotproto, the changes they made in their first re-submission were sufficient: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23168874 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23168874
  • ShamelessC 6y ago
    Makes you wonder - was there even a problem in the first place? Or were they just trying to silently kill this extension but failed due to this going viral? I understand they were using a very broad wildcard for permission on websites they could access. I'm glad they narrowed that down. But after they did, they still needed this to blow up in order to get an actual response.
    • ebg13 6y ago
      > Makes you wonder - was there even a problem in the first place? YES. > I understand they were using a very broad wildcard for permission on websites they could access That is a problem.
      • saurik 6y ago
        But we still don't know if that was the actual reason the app got pulled, as if that were the case it should have been trivial for a computer to notice it was fixed; do you not see how that sucks?