I also think that Dare is suffering from a bit of confirmation bias. Without mentioning the net exchange of people between Microsoft and Google, there is no way

I also think that Dare is suffering from a bit of confirmation bias. Without mentioning the net exchange of people between Microsoft and Google, there is no way to gauge which company is "best" to work for. Dare only provides anecdotal evidence - "at least 8 people I know personally have rejoined". Considering the possibility that most Microsofties have returned or will return to Microsoft is however still not proof that Microsoft is unconditionally better than Google (and vice-versa, if most ex-Microsofties stay at Google, we don't have unconditional proof that Google is better). Many Microsofties might have grown used to the MS environment and might - if only through force of habit - prefer the MS environment. I'm not sure whether Dare wants to correct the perception that there is a debilitating exodus of people from MS to Google; I can understand such a motivation, since Yahoo's recent woes prove how a little bad news can cause massive demoralization. But still, I can't agree with his relaxed anecdotal method.