3 ms·
I don't think it does. You have still the issue of the unhappy monster once everyone else has hit the "max" utility. You would spend all your resources on them
by IanCal 6y ago
I don't think it does. You have still the issue of the unhappy monster once everyone else has hit the "max" utility. You would spend all your resources on them rather than improve things for the rest of the group because they are now deemed unimprovable.
- stared 6y agoYou don't get anyone hit 0 or 1. (Compare with probabilities predicted by a sigmoid - it never reaches 0 or 1.)
- ben_w 6y agoLoose eyelashes vs factory farmed human flesh. Both are finite pain/finite negative utility. How many of the former must be avoided to equally balance the creation of one of the latter?
- chaorace 6y agoQuestion: how is that mathematically different from bounding by negative & positive infinity?
- stared 6y agosigmoid(x_1 + ... + x_n) != sigmoid(x_1) + ... + sigmoid(x_n)