3 ms·
??? The Kong’s conclusion wasn’t causal with any statistical certainty (which is what the above is arguing). It was anecdotal. Maybe the poison doesn’t work fo
by jwilber 6y ago
???
The Kong’s conclusion wasn’t causal with any statistical certainty (which is what the above is arguing). It was anecdotal.
Maybe the poison doesn’t work for carriers of certain genes. Maybe it’s temperature reactive. Maybe it’ll take weeks to kill.
Just because the King observes something do not make his causal conclusions from that observation valid. Adequate sample-sized statistics aim to bridge that gap.
- natalyarostova 6y ago> The Kong’s conclusion wasn’t causal with any statistical certainty (which is what the above is arguing). It was anecdotal. There ain't no such thing as statistical certainty my friend.
- gridlockd 6y agohttp://gunshowcomic.com/831 http://gunshowcomic.com/831
- tinus_hn 6y agoWell that settles it. Better keep on doing nothing!
- Fjolsvith 6y ago(n=0)