3 ms·
They can certainly make it illegal to pay any fines, though. Also, >you can't be punished for removing something from your billboard. Sure you can, you can ju
by qball 6y ago
They can certainly make it illegal to pay any fines, though.
Also,
>you can't be punished for removing something from your billboard.
Sure you can, you can just be treated as a "curator" rather than a "publisher" and thus liable for your curated collection. That's the whole point of S. 230, after all.
- tzs 6y agoThere is nothing in S. 230 that distinguishes between curators and publishers. It says: > No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. "Information content provider" is: > The term “information content provider” means any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service In fact, the point of S. 230 was to allow sites to block and filter offensive material without that making them liable for the material that their filtering or blocking did not remove. There's a decent history of how this came about on Wikipedia [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act#History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communicati...