3 ms·

That it's not perfectly reproducible should be setting off alarm bells, even for people who would really like this effect to work at the scale of a few metres.

by Jedd 6y ago

emmelaich 6y ago
I'm not sure that any experiment is perfectly reproducible. Though I would be very surprised to see a hurricane going the wrong way at mid-latitudes! Anyway, we're in agreement that it is a thing, and we just need a big enough tub to demonstrate it, correct? The force is perfectly calculable, and we can compare that to the effect of, say, a breeze across the top. ps. the reference https://www.nature.com/articles/2071084a0 https://www.nature.com/articles/2071084a0 "Published: 01 September 1965 The Bath-Tub Vortex in the Southern Hemisphere LLOYD M. TREFETHEN, R. W. BILGER, P. T. FINK, R. E. LUXTON & R. I. TANNER pps. my earlier mention https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15122988 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15122988 Nature volume 207, pages1084–1085(1965)"
- Jedd 6y ago
  Yeah, I can't access that Nature link from 1965. AIUI the math is that the delta in acceleration across a 1m bathtub north-to-south would be 1x10-8 m/s/s due to Coriolis ... so your starting conditions would have to be at a level of perfection that I don't think anyone's achieved, certainly not some bloke in a drafty garage with a kiddy's wading pool one time. I accept that in theory that delta definitely exists, but I don't accept that it can be, has ever been, observed at the tiny scales of a few metres, let alone the 100mm (toilet flushes) that's typically asserted by the faithful. I accept that across dozens of kilometres we definitely do see this phenomenon as it generates consistent, hemisphere-dependent, large wind events (eg hurricanes) once you get a good way from the equator.
steerablesafe 6y ago
It's probably reproducible in the sense that if you do it a 100 times you get a strong statistically significant effect. They were probably unlucky that day.

That it's not perfectly reproducible should be setting off alarm bells, even for people who would really like this effect to work at the scale of a few metres.

by Jedd 6y ago

That it's not perfectly reproducible should be setting off alarm bells, even for people who would really like this effect to work at the scale of a few metres.

emmelaich 6y ago

I'm not sure that any experiment is perfectly reproducible. Though I would be very surprised to see a hurricane going the wrong way at mid-latitudes! Anyway, we're in agreement that it is a thing, and we just need a big enough tub to demonstrate it, correct? The force is perfectly calculable, and we can compare that to the effect of, say, a breeze across the top. ps. the reference https://www.nature.com/articles/2071084a0 https://www.nature.com/articles/2071084a0 "Published: 01 September 1965 The Bath-Tub Vortex in the Southern Hemisphere LLOYD M. TREFETHEN, R. W. BILGER, P. T. FINK, R. E. LUXTON & R. I. TANNER pps. my earlier mention https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15122988 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15122988 Nature volume 207, pages1084–1085(1965)"

Jedd 6y ago
Yeah, I can't access that Nature link from 1965. AIUI the math is that the delta in acceleration across a 1m bathtub north-to-south would be 1x10-8 m/s/s due to Coriolis ... so your starting conditions would have to be at a level of perfection that I don't think anyone's achieved, certainly not some bloke in a drafty garage with a kiddy's wading pool one time. I accept that in theory that delta definitely exists, but I don't accept that it can be, has ever been, observed at the tiny scales of a few metres, let alone the 100mm (toilet flushes) that's typically asserted by the faithful. I accept that across dozens of kilometres we definitely do see this phenomenon as it generates consistent, hemisphere-dependent, large wind events (eg hurricanes) once you get a good way from the equator.

steerablesafe 6y ago

It's probably reproducible in the sense that if you do it a 100 times you get a strong statistically significant effect. They were probably unlucky that day.