3 ms·
This depends on the evolution of the culture of the site. There is a possibility that no-value distractions will be discouraged.
by jshevek 6y ago
This depends on the evolution of the culture of the site. There is a possibility that no-value distractions will be discouraged.
- chris_wot 6y agoMy penis is not low value.
- jshevek 6y agoIf a specific Unicode symbol adds actual clarity or meaning in some context, I would not expect it to be discouraged. I didn't mean my adjectives as a generalization of unicode graphics, but the opposite: a specification of circumstances.
- BolexNOLA 6y agoI want you to know I’m not kidding when I say I snorted so loud when I read this that I woke up my 12 week old haha. Worth it.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- dungdang 6y agodo you think that your and dong's constant discussion about the discussion is not 10x worse at diluting pertinent content?
- jshevek 6y ago"Constant." You may have me confused with someone else. There should be more discussion about the discussion, as discussion about the discussion shapes the future.
- tonyedgecombe 6y agoNo, it might not be the cause but it is usually an indication of decline.
- jshevek 6y agoI'm not sure what you mean by 'it'. Are you saying that a discussion of the discussion may not cause a decline a community's culture, but could indicate such a decline?
- tonyedgecombe 6y agoYes.
- dungdang 6y agodo i now.. you have more comments in this thread about the discussion than the topic. that is offtopic spam. here's an idea. if you have nothing to say on topic, and want to discuss discussion, start a thread about discussions. crazy that people on a thread about intel want to read intel comments.