> In other words, it's US exceptionalism both ways around, that is, circular reasoning. Why should anyone bother to try and have a good faith argument here? I'

> In other words, it's US exceptionalism both ways around, that is, circular reasoning. Why should anyone bother to try and have a good faith argument here? I've assumed good intent with my reply and included size examples of Australia and Canada referring to my linked paper, so I suppose we will find out.