Interesting, thanks. Not clear to me when reading the announcement is: will hyperdrive replace dat? From reading the comments here, it seems that the answer is

Interesting, thanks. Not clear to me when reading the announcement is: will hyperdrive replace dat? From reading the comments here, it seems that the answer is "yes". Now, onto the content, you touch on de-duplication. I am quite concerned with the cost associated to updating a large file. Is something like rolling hashes investigated, to chunk files independently of their size? I guess it is, given you seem to be working hard on de-duplication. But then, that kind of trick best works on uncompressed data, which is inefficient for transmission. Is data compressed before transmission? Whole chunks, or whole files at a time? Ahead of time? Interactively based on what the peer needs? The trade-offs are many, and complex to investigate. I'm wondering if this could be used as an OS image, like OSTree does? And lastly, I did not get if multiple peers having the same private key identity could modify the structure simultaneously. What would happen? Also, nodejs gave me a kneejerk reaction that may be unwarranted, but that's quite a huge dependency to pull in for something that wants to be a ubiquitous building block. Does it have a C API? Also, twitter, discord, github (node to a lesser extent)... it seems somewhat ironic to build a ultimate decentralized filesystem while relying on these hypercentralized offerings, and I am afraid it could turn some contributors off.