4 ms·
I think it's interesting to tie this to recent news about Khan Academy. According to various talks by Sal Khan, many kids used the free videos to educate thems
by kjksf 16y ago
I think it's interesting to tie this to recent news about Khan Academy.
According to various talks by Sal Khan, many kids used the free videos to educate themselves about math etc. to a level better than most kids achieve in a school.
Better eduction, without teachers, for free.
If you look at YouTube's numbers for how often those videos are watched, it's in tens or hundreds of thousand of views.
I assume that most of those are from kids who watch them to learn something (I can't fathom a different reason for watching a video on multiplication).
That means at least tens of thousands of kids have been educated - the model works as a mass education medium.
I think that the current school model is broken for many reasons and lack of quality teachers is only a small portion of it, so discussing how to rise quality of teachers by paying them more misses the larger point.
We should be thinking how to fix all of the problems.
It just happens that Khan Academy model is the only realistic way (that I can see) to actually fix the system. The fix is by inverting the traditional model. Instead of one person (teacher) lecturing 20+ kids (who all differ in their current understanding of topic and how quickly they can learn new information) for an hour and giving homework assignments, the kids learn from videos, at their own pace, and teacher are there to assist when a kid reaches a stumbling block.
The above description doesn't fully convey how this works but you can find out more via videos on http://khanacademy.org http://khanacademy.org. Khan Academy is already doing pilot studies with some schools and results (unsurprisingly to me) are promising.
- jshen 16y agoSome tiny fraction of kids teach themselves and you're implying that teachers aren't important? That's a non sequitur on a few different levels.
- chrismanfrank 16y agoI don't think kj is saying teachers aren't important, just that there might be a better way. And remember, only a 'tiny fraction' of people were on Facebook at some point.
- jshen 16y agoA better way than teachers? Isn't that saying teachers aren't important? Also, it seems wrong to come to that conclusion based on some tiny fraction of kids.
- zdw 16y agoI'd disagree with the conclusion. Khan made a really good set of tools to teach with. His model is great if you're looking at replacing textbooks with something better, which is sorely needed. The problem is that teaching isn't about delivering information as much as it is about evaluation, answering questions, and having soft skills. Khan does none of those things. (While I like what I've seen of Khan, I generally avoid "screencasts" (which is pretty much what Khan's things are) and other learning materials that have a typically low information/time ratio - I feel I can learn faster if something was written out in longer form as I'm a fast reader.)