3 ms·

I wonder how that works, and haven't it run into problems? (E.g. relying on FindFirstFile for info). Maybe it's all right when comes to compiling... just this h

• acqq 6y ago
  > Maybe it's all right when comes to compiling I would not expect problems, once there are no bugs in the code. As far as I understand, a build tool doesn't need file sizes, only the timestamps. The code appears to do sensible things, e.g. it notes "FindExInfoBasic is 30% faster than FindExInfoStandard" and uses the former when possible. Looking "from 20000 ft", the only to me unexpected thing I see is handling ".." there, somehow I expected that code which uses that wouldn't even need the timestamp of "..".