> Don't use the term 'modern Lisp', 9/10 it's signaling the wrong thing. I think it's signalling exactly the right thing. We know exactly what to expect when s

> Don't use the term 'modern Lisp', 9/10 it's signaling the wrong thing. I think it's signalling exactly the right thing. We know exactly what to expect when someone claims they've made a "modern Lisp". That phrase has come to mean "something with parentheses that demonstrates that its author doesn't understand Lisp at all."