3 ms·
> Then you could add some sort of ctrl-p style fuzzy search that includes both url and content. Try focusing the URL bar in Firefox and prefixing your query w
by padenot 6y ago
> Then you could add some sort of ctrl-p style fuzzy search that includes both url and content.
Try focusing the URL bar in Firefox and prefixing your query with '%'. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/address-bar-autocomplete-firefox#w_changing-results-on-the-fly https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/address-bar-autocomplet... shows more prefixes like this. It does not search the content of the page, but is super useful still.
- andrewaylett 6y agoYou need a space after the '%', which always confused and annoyed me. But TIL: the special character doesn't need to be a prefix! It only needs to be separated from other characters using a space. Makes much more sense now.
- TeMPOraL 6y agoApparently you don't! I just tested that on 76.0 (64-bit) on Windows, and it works without a space.
- TheArcane 6y agoThe worst part is that % cannot search across containers I'm baffled how firefox hasn't figured this out yet
- Tobu 6y agoHere's the bug [1]; apparently someone made it so on purpose [2]. In related issues, I'd like switch to tab to be consistent so that ctrl-clicking on an awesomebar result always opens it in a new tab, instead of depending on whether it found a tab or not. [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479858 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479858 [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287866 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287866
- TheArcane 6y ago> apparently someone made it so on purpose [2] This is terribly unfortunate, given that there are many active bugs associated with this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479858 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479858 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1500991 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1500991 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1538069 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1538069 I've read the thread you linked and I still don't understand their reasoning for this.