3 ms·
1. yes. In general, society exists to serve a collection of individuals, not as an end in itself, so in my view, society cannot unduly infringe on the rights of
by theonemind 6y ago
1. yes. In general, society exists to serve a collection of individuals, not as an end in itself, so in my view, society cannot unduly infringe on the rights of individuals. Considering that a person may generally end their life without assistance, but not reliably, I'd place suicide in the 'inalienable rights' category on which society may not infringe. Also, this gives others some vague say on whether you "suffer enough". They don't have your experience, I don't think they get to say "you don't suffer enough" based on apparent lack of suffering from a serious illness. I can't conceive of anything that gives others the right to judge that.
2. Yes. Same as above.
3. Yes. Same as above.
4. I don't think I understand the question.
- abellerose 6y ago# 4 would be performing the treatment by oneself instead of being allowed for someone else to administer the treatment to the person requesting it.