3 ms·
Who Just Voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History with Warrant
- ChrisGranger 6y agoWithout a warrant... it's kind of an important distinction.
- mythrwy 6y agoImportant distinction: article headline says "Without"
- bitxbitxbitcoin 6y agoHere's hoping another amendment can be proposed, with much the same verbiage, so this can be voted down.
- r00t_ 6y agoFor some reason, I read 'Who' as 'WHO'. Actual headline: Here's Who Just Voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History Without a Warrant
- LatteLazy 6y agoTrick question: No one just voted, it’s been standard practise for almost 20 years, both parties and the courts all support it or at least refuse to take even the smallest action to stop it.
- fish45 6y agoThe proposed law would make the FBI require a warrant whereas right now they do not. Clickbaity article but it's still important
- IXxXI 6y agoIf the FBI had nothing to hide. They wouldn't push for warrantless surveillance.