4 ms·
I think we need a component of future expectations in prices because it increases incentives I'm extremely wary of the term "increased incentives" in light of
by jeromec 16y ago
I think we need a component of future expectations in prices because it increases incentives
I'm extremely wary of the term "increased incentives" in light of recent events sparked by this model on Wall St.
and provides funding for averting real future shortages.
We just don't see gas lines to support that argument.
Edit: And what do you mean "provides funding" anyway? Speculative contracts don't raise oil producing levels, nor stockpile oil (as our Strategic Reserve does). The extra money which exists is all used up by the speculators playing the game.
- fauigerzigerk 16y agoGeneral anti Wall St. sentiment is not a very potent argument. It's difficult to deny that higher prices increase supply and/or destroy demand. Wall St. didn't invent this logic.
- jeromec 16y agoGeneral anti Wall St. sentiment is not a very potent argument. I'm not anti-Wall St. But I am anti-recklessness when it means wreaking havoc on our national (and by extension entire world) economy. It's difficult to deny that higher prices increase supply and/or destroy demand. No, it's not. Actually, higher prices usually mean there is decreased supply and increased demand. That's in a normal market. But we don't even have a normal oil market. That's the entire point. When oil prices skyrocketed to record levels above $145/barrel in 2008 it wasn't because of increased demand, and those astronomical prices didn't mean an increased supply of oil either.
- im3w1l 16y agoHe is saying that "higher prices -> lower demand" You say that, "no higher demand -> higher prices" Both are true
- fauigerzigerk 16y agoI think our misunderstanding is that you're talking about what has happened and I'm talking about what is resulting from it. Higher prices mean that demand has been growing faster than supply. As a consequence, suppliers now want to supply more and consumers want to consume less. So higher prices incentivise more supply.
- jeromec 16y agoHigher prices mean that demand has been growing faster than supply. But that's not the cause of our higher prices. Listen, I can't keep arguing this. Do me a big favor and just read the first 3 paragraphs here: http://useconomy.about.com/od/commoditiesmarketfaq/p/high_oil_prices.htm http://useconomy.about.com/od/commoditiesmarketfaq/p/high_oi... As a consequence, suppliers now want to supply more and consumers want to consume less. Suppliers want to supply more. So, if you're some Saudi Arabian sheik witnessing these astronomical oil prices you really want increase oil production and supply more? What will that do to oil prices? Think about what you're saying.
- fauigerzigerk 16y agoExactly. If I'm an owner of an oil field I prefer to sell at higher prices and if prices are high I invest more in exploration. Of course prices are not just influenced by supply and demand. They are also influenced by speculation. I never denied that. What I'm saying is that speculation changes the timing and increases the volatility, but it cannot decouple from supply and demand indefinitely. So if we're running out of easily accessible oil in, say 20 years, and speculation increases today's prices in expectation of that, that's a good thing. Of course it is a double edged sword. Sometimes future expectations never materialize and speculation ends up destroying value.
- fauigerzigerk 16y agoHigh oil prices make alternatives economically viable so they get funded. It's pretty simple.
- jeromec 16y agoOooh, it's a bit of a slippery slope to try to argue that. A shift in political winds and/or attitude can cancel/limit alternative energy funding in a heartbeat.