Hey Michel, thanks for joining the conversation and clarifying things. I'm far from being an expert on Dgraph so I learned a few things from your answer. Rega

Hey Michel, thanks for joining the conversation and clarifying things. I'm far from being an expert on Dgraph so I learned a few things from your answer. Regarding the data model, that makes sense. I read that Dgraph support properties so I thought you built something along the lines of the RDF+ framework with seems to support properties and labels. Yes, you're right, ontologies can be represented in any graph but it's clear that RDF is a better option due to the reasons you mentioned and other ones. That's the nice thing about the emergence of different graph databases, you get to pick the right system for the right job :) When it comes to performance, to be honest, I'm not a big fan of random benchmarks, as it's always tricky to get them right, especially for systems that have big differences. We usually let developers do that for their specific use-cases and we just try to help them set up Memgraph as best as possible. Cheers.