3 ms·
I'd view it as more tautological than that. "If you don't understand security then you don't understand security" isn't really controversial.
by kerkeslager 6y ago
I'd view it as more tautological than that. "If you don't understand security then you don't understand security" isn't really controversial.
- at_a_remove 6y ago"If you have not yet attained Buddhahood, you cannot understand the value of enlightenment." is also a non-controversial tautology, but it also doesn't leave any room for anyone to do anything else.
- kerkeslager 6y agoIf you're being paid to secure a system, there isn't room for you to not secure the system.
- at_a_remove 6y agoThe most secure system, naturally, being one that is turned off with its network connection desoldered. At last, nirvana!
- kerkeslager 6y agoSo clever! But, obviously we're talking about making a good-faith effort to secure servers while allowing them to provide their intended functions. Refusing to implement HTTPS because you don't know how to use Certbot isn't that.
- at_a_remove 6y agoAs stated, Certbot wouldn't work in the case I mentioned.
- kerkeslager 6y agoBased on your description, it would work just fine, you're just prevented by contract from using it.