> Trump is more colorful and in your face about it, but I do not believe his Administration is more corrupt, he just does not have the media covering for him li

> Trump is more colorful and in your face about it, but I do not believe his Administration is more corrupt, he just does not have the media covering for him like the past administration have I think there is support, among many in the media at least, for the idea that Trump's administration is more corrupt than Nixon's; but surely you would not claim that Nixon's administration was one that enjoyed extensive media coddling? > Tyranny defined as that which is legal for government but illegal for the citizenry. This is an over-expansive definition of tyranny, I think. It says, for example, that waging war against another country is tyranny. I can imagine adopting this position, but is it what you mean? (It's also hard for me to apply even this expansive definition of tyranny to: > Those charges [against Flynn] by the FBI are a clear example of Tyranny (Tyranny defined as that which is legal for government but illegal for the citizenry). I agree that the government can lay criminal charges against an individual, whereas an individual cannot do so against another, but that is a very general phenomenon that has nothing particular to do with Flynn's case, so again I assume that it's not what you mean.)