4 ms·
Yah, they said "convolution reverb," so I think they expected audience to know what it was. Often it's not about creating new technology, but making existing te
by aeturnum 6y ago
Yah, they said "convolution reverb," so I think they expected audience to know what it was. Often it's not about creating new technology, but making existing technology accessible to new audiences and new creators.
- neotriple 6y agoHonestly, convolution reverb is already highly accessible. It’s a feature in $50 (and probably free) reverb plug-ins for anybody that does audio. They’re relatively easy to implement and have probably been around for a decade+. As the OP said, the audio things they mentioned aren’t new or adding any accessibility imo
- thewebcount 6y agoThey were doing it in the 80s for music when samplers first became big.
- neotriple 6y agoYeah I figured so, but didn’t want to look up examples since I was on mobile and thus stuck with my more conservative value of decade+.
- haywirez 6y agoYou have it right now in the browser Web Audio API, for free[1] [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ConvolverNode https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ConvolverNo...