> “...anything that discourages customary amateur landlordism has to be a good thing.” i’m not super-sympathetic to the plight of most landlords, but that’s to

> “...anything that discourages customary amateur landlordism has to be a good thing.” i’m not super-sympathetic to the plight of most landlords, but that’s too vindictive and counter-productive. i’d rather have an escalating tax on number of units owned, with a sweet spot where landlords can make enough to be professional (have good tools and service providers), but discourage an overbearing imbalance of power over large numbers of other humans. i’d intuitively guess the sweet spot is probably in the range of 4-20 units, or 1 building with however many units, in high density zones.